Analysis of Grammatical Forms and Semantic Functions of Hedging in Political Discourse: American Presidential Debate Analysis of Grammatical Forms and Semantic Functions of Hedging in Political Discourse: American Presidential Debate

الملخص

Abstract:
Hedging is a linguistic avoidance of full commitment or precision. It is the use
of a vague language. The main objectives of this study are to: (1) identify and classify
the linguistic devices which act as hedges; (2) to examine the semantic functions of
these devices.
This paper makes use of word class as well as clausal constructions to
represent the forms of hedges in relation to certain grammatical categories, namely:
adverbials, epistemic verbs, modal verbs, cognitive verbs, hypothetical constructions,
anticipatory it-clause, and anticipatory constructions.
The text analysed is the first presidential debate between Senator Barak
Obama and Senator John McCain on the campus of the University of Mississippi,
during the presidential election campaign of the Republican and the Democrat parties
in America.
The results show that politicians use hedges to mild their language in process
to, so that not to be proved wrong later. This justification is that the claims they had
already made were only an approximation to the statements.